Let the tablet wars begin - O'Reilly Radar

Yesterday, Hewlett-Packard announced the launch of its TouchPad tablet, which is scheduled to hit stores sometime this summer — no pricing information has been released, however.

The announcement was timely, as Apple is in a bit of a battle with publishers over subscription and in-app purchasing policies. HP is taking Apple head-on, even hiring one of Apple's senior directors to help draw developers.

Also notable is that HP has signed on Time Inc., allowing the publisher to provide magazine subscriptions under agreeable terms. The European Newspaper Association (ENPA) is likely taking note as its concerns over Apple's subscription policies intensify.

Competition - don't you just love it!

Planet iPad: Publishing Perestroika: Indie Authors Blow Away Traditional Gatekeepers and Storm the Castle of Newspaper Bestseller Lists ; 18 Of Top 50 On Amazon By Indie Authors

As a result of the Publishing Perestroika that has been unleashed by readers and writers connecting primarily around Kindle content in the short span of just 39 months, the walls that have kept self-published and ebook authors from being included in prestigious newspaper bestseller lists will come crashing down this week.

Tomorrow, USA TODAY will roll out its weekly list of the top 150 bestselling books in the U.S., just as it does every Thursday.

Amanda Hocking
But for the very first time, USA Today announced today, its list for the week ending February 6 will include bestselling self-published direct-to-Kindle authors like Amanda Hocking. Hocking's books currently rank #3, #11, #12, #27, #37, #41, and #46 on the Kindle Store top 50 bestsellers, and "the three titles in her Trylle Trilogy (Switched, Torn and Ascend, the latest) will make their debuts in the top 50 of USA TODAY's Best-Selling Books list," wrote USA Today's Carol Memmott in an article entitled "Authors catch fire with self-published ebooks."

It just keeps getting better! Read the whole article.

Skype and Facebook?

Is one-click calling via Skype from inside Facebook about to happen? Mike Melanson seems to think so:
Last September, news broke that Facebook and VoIP service Skype were about to announce a "deep integration partnership" that would bring integration of SMS and voice chat. A couple weeks later, we got Skype 5.0, which included an integrated Facebook phonebook and browsing, but we asked when we would see the opposite - Skype integration on Facebook.

Mashable: Facebook Finally Adds HTTPS Support

Facebook has finally added the ability to access the site via a HTTP Secure (HTTPS) connection, which should drastically increase security for users.

HTTPS provides a combination of the HTTP and SSL protocols, enabling encrypted communication between your computer and a web server. Without it you’re exposed to sniffing attacks on the network; for example, if you’re using a public Wi-Fi to access Facebook via plain HTTP, someone using the Firesheep add-on for Firefox can easily retrieve your data. HTTPS makes it far more harder to do that.

The feature is available as an option on the Account Settings page. If you don’t see it yet, don’t worry: Facebook will be gradually rolling it out over the next couple of weeks.

This is great news! Read it all . . .

Dear Michael: An Open Letter From The Present About The Future Of Your Past

San Francisco, CA

21st January 2011

Dear Michael Moore-Jones,

I just finished reading your thought-provoking post –  “A Future Without Personal History” – over at ReadWriteWeb and felt compelled to write you this note. I was particularly taken by your concern that your entire generation will grow up without ever having written and mailed a letter, and as such will leave no permanent record of their lives.

Hell, you know you’re getting old when someone fifteen years younger than you is bitching about the state of the modern world.

Still, yours was an argument well presented; certainly better than I could have managed at the age of sixteen. And I was with you all the way. Or at least all the way up to your conclusion where you suggested a solution to the problem of guaranteeing a sustainable record of your life: “copying and pasting communication from all different formats into different documents stored both on hard drive and in the cloud.”

It’s on that point we part company.

In fact, if you really want to create the kind of historical paper trail your parents (and mine) will leave behind, you’re going to have to do far more than simply copying and pasting your tweets and emails and saving them in the cloud.

For a start, trust me Michael, in fifteen years members of the Millennial generation will have many technological regrets, but one of them will not be a lack of personal history online. Data has a habit of sticking around, albeit in fragmented form, particularly when we don’t want it to. Given the number of backups – and backups of backups – and copying and pasting and retweeting that goes on today, 2025’s 30 year olds will live in a world where every detail of their life is recorded and archived somewhere in the cloud. Every underage drink or youthful indiscretion; every photo taken during their 10,957 days on earth; every SMS declaration of love and every piece of online trolling. It’ll all be there – somewhere – just waiting to come back and bite them in the ass. Backing all of that up will just ensure that it’s all easier to find.

But what it won’t do is present a coherent personal history, any more than a million footsteps in the snow can adequately describe the journeys of the people who left them.

To blame the demise of physical letters is to conflate medium with message. The reason why people hold on to old love notes and take pleasure in reading the journals of those long dead is because, generally speaking, people who took the time to mail a letter or keep a private journal did so because they had something to say, a story to tell, love to declare or forgiveness to beg. You could print out every tweet that most people have ever written and the value of them wouldn’t even approach that of a single line from Anne Frank’s diary or one of Byron’s – or Orwell’s – letters.

And yet, Michael, for all your youthful conviction that every problem must have a technological solution, you remain fundamentally right. Our obsession with social media and email has resulted in a world in which most people have no interest in ensuring a lasting historical record of their lives. And it’s a problem not just for your generation, but for mine and for my parents’ and for every generation that has access to computers and the Internet.

Thanks to Twitter, Facebook and email, people of all ages have so many outlets for self-expression that they are left with neither the time nor inclination to collect their thoughts into a journal or even a letter. After all, why spend hours – even years – writing something for a far-off audience of one when you can spend seconds to reach an instant audience of hundreds, or thousands. The more we evolve away from the notion of deferred gratification, the more pronounced the problem will become.

And yet… The fact that the problem is largely attitudinal, rather than generational or technological points to a solution that is equally age-agnostic. Last year I decided to quit social media in order to focus more on blogging. In fact, shortly after I made that decision, I realised that moving back to blogging wasn’t the answer either – and not least because writing about my life for a wide audience is perilously close to being my day job.

Instead I resolved to use the time I would have spent tweeting and updating various statuses to keep a paper journal again. Not for profound thoughts or Bridget Jones bullshit, but rather as a sensible way to sift through the dozes of events of each day and record – with context – anything I might like to remember in future years.

Similarly, I’ve rediscovered the joy of letter writing. A useful side-effect of everyone using email and phone calls is that almost no-one receives letters in the mail any more. So when they do – no matter if the sender is a friend, a prospective lover or just some random shmuck – it stands out high above the noise. As a result, in the past months I’ve enjoyed correspondence with countless people who I wouldn’t otherwise have been able to reach, and I’ve been reminded of the thrill of seeing familiar handwriting in my mailbox.

So, Michael, if you’re serious about this whole personal history thing, I’d urge you to shut down your laptop for a few hours and pick up a pen. The rewards might not be quite as immediate as sending a tweet, but trust me when I say the long-term gains more than make up for it.

Oh, and if that isn’t enough to convince you, please accept my assurance on one other thing. Chicks dig guys who send them letters.

Yours in anticipation of a bright future for the past,

Paul

P.S. Wear sunscreen

I still think there are viable digital solutions . . .

A Future Without Personal History

From ReadWriteWeb:

My parents still have letters that they received more than 30 years ago, and when they read them now they say that they detail entire relationships and friendships. They have vast amounts of information about their own history stored inside the letters that they sent and received. It goes even further than that. My grandmother still has letters she received from her grandmother. If it weren't for those letters, all that information about my own family history would have been lost, or confined to memory (which, as my parents are discovering, fails us all eventually).

Guest author Michael Moore-Jones is a sixteen-year-old who has grown up globally, but is currently based in Wellington, New Zealand. He is passionate about technology and business, and is involved in numerous startups. You can read his thoughts on his blog at mmoorejones.com, or follow him on Twitter at @mmoorejones.

And yet, I can't tell anyone what I was discussing with someone a month ago. That's testament to the digital age that I, and everyone in my generation, is a native member of. I find myself feeling incredibly guilty that my parents and grandparents went to so much effort to ensure that our family history was kept, and here I am frequently losing information about my life.

The frequency and brevity of messages sent today combined with the numerous mediums used means that this personal information now has a much lower perceived value: Your email storage fills up - you delete all your messages. You get a new mobile phone - all of your SMS's are lost.

Some people are already worrying about what may happen if we continue to throw away our information. For example, the U.S. Library of Congress announced in April last year that it would be archiving every Twitter message ever sent. Sure it's a phenomenal undertaking, but in no way is it enough. Think about all the different mediums of communication you use.

For example, today alone I have communicated with people via SMS, email, Facebook messages, Facebook chat, Whatsapp Messenger, Skype chat, and Twitter. Out of those, only my public Twitter updates are being stored. There are other efforts like the Library of Congress' undertaking, but mass archiving won't help us store our individual histories in a way that we can access.

What happens if, in three years, I want to go back through all my communications with my girlfriend? I may not be using an iPhone in three years, so all of my messages on Whatsapp Messenger will be gone. I definitely won't be using the same mobile phone, so all of my SMS's will be gone. My Gmail storage will have filled up, so I won't have any of our emails any more. I doubt I'll even still be using Facebook - there's all of that communication gone.

All of this information that is so important and so relevant to me personally is just disappearing, and I won't be able to track the relationships and friendships that I have had.

Personally, I am now backing up my computer daily, and copying and pasting communication from all different formats into different documents stored both on hard drive and in the cloud. While it's a start, it's an absolutely horrific task, and doesn't completely work (I'm not going to be transcribing my SMS's into a document).

The abundance of technology is severely devaluing information. Do we go on ignoring this fact, and losing the details of our lives? Or do we do the hard work, and attempt to effectively store our communications? I know that I'll be putting in the hard work - at least until the magicians in Silicon Valley come up with a better solution.

 

Photo by adamci

 

How to move your iTunes Media folder | Macworld

If you love music, movies, TV shows, and podcasts there’s a good chance that your iTunes Media folder (formerly called the iTunes Music folder, and yours might be called that if you’ve been using iTunes for a long time) has swollen to the point where it’s pushing up against the bounds of your hard drive’s capacity. In such cases you need to move your media to a more expansive drive. Here are the steps for doing just that.

I2ocr: Image Document Text Extractor

Thanks to OCR technology, you can convert images of text into text documents. This saves a lot of time retyping the same document. If you have a text-including image saved on your computer or have its URL, you can use i2OCR to extract the text from the image.

image document text

image document text

i2OCR is a free and simple to use website that lets you extract text from images. The image can be stored on your computer or online. For best results, the text in the image should be clear. The image must be at least 200 dpi and less than 10MB in size. The extracted text is displayed so that you can copy and use it. Alternatively you can download the text in DOC format.

Features:

Check out i2OCR @ www.sciweavers.org/free-online-ocr (by MOin from ThumbPress)